livelog 46,173 entries · root 65986277d9d9 · read 06:05:19
the record/entry 44269
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GD7LU635IE4CQG5MU2LBX2QFQYKTXP5DDK6RSDJDUWD5YQLRJJQRL6K2 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.208ms2026-09-11 19:25:09
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GD7LU635IE4CQG5MU2LBX2QFQYKTXP5DDK6RSDJDUWD5YQLRJJQRL6K2 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
be78f9eb99c5f1d694e694fd9d95f5104d3a17b030d14d5427ba735509db9546
request
326a4300bd691bbec3187e52af0d53e979e914e4f409f5f43c654dfef9b6f9d7
transaction
c755058e2e5c6cb065740e66a98b541a84cae003b33ca360d834dd5c5bdc64e8
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 44269
recomputing…
the chainentry 44269
sealed to the entry before
93fc3f10a40d44b9ae0e736d67c0eab1ce6f174f5b1b15f6793cd4aae3ddf5c6
this leaf
f4b7fc1f4ada0fd573dad22501a713676d403d33c6c67abb270f00124f727edc
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
WS2eWpcXhExPX0mH8hPaUmj3N5Kr53gfcoJE71ul3+zmsFdFSswku53ziGd6kJbN64/+sKhymN3fNmH9RZyjBA==