why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GD7LU635IE4CQG5MU2LBX2QFQYKTXP5DDK6RSDJDUWD5YQLRJJQRL6K2 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- be78f9eb99c5f1d694e694fd9d95f5104d3a17b030d14d5427ba735509db9546
- request
- 326a4300bd691bbec3187e52af0d53e979e914e4f409f5f43c654dfef9b6f9d7
- transaction
- c755058e2e5c6cb065740e66a98b541a84cae003b33ca360d834dd5c5bdc64e8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 44269
the chainentry 44269
- sealed to the entry before
- 93fc3f10a40d44b9ae0e736d67c0eab1ce6f174f5b1b15f6793cd4aae3ddf5c6
- this leaf
- f4b7fc1f4ada0fd573dad22501a713676d403d33c6c67abb270f00124f727edc
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- WS2eWpcXhExPX0mH8hPaUmj3N5Kr53gfcoJE71ul3+zmsFdFSswku53ziGd6kJbN64/+sKhymN3fNmH9RZyjBA==