why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GA65L6RHFM4BG5FAVW7QZLJX5MEWYJFG3S6YFKMOKJTIJ7IEMDS7WO4X, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GA65L6RHFM4BG5FAVW7QZLJX5MEWYJFG3S6YFKMOKJTIJ7IEMDS7WO4X is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 4cc1228d042868f3d232ddad4484d3978000baa4aac6b65a4f3252a9a3ca9f40
- request
- 0f011e5bf71748c0eafecc9a4362c9743dbaa072f84f0234f7cb2b1cb869ad0c
- transaction
- f2c9bf7c5a08e950f3ac44fcbb86ae35e7e6f5749bca29906898b5fe6c8f098fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 3930
the chainentry 3930
- sealed to the entry before
- 6068dd1505ce3a3b1c893e731905c8cdccf255a6737342ebd4b480bdc1e1b762
- this leaf
- f510bb0b063037cdbb85377ccd202b55bfcea582e5f6a9a8a509ebcb74e4486f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- K0DGSd1ms0DhjniZ56IpIflS8hvzeFVcjdDbcR36PVBVtoA8v0e5RzbFlO28oR042BGCcvVyeT2SLYutp/sVAw==