why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC4TTAS6FBLNXEWL5O6TWLCBWNPUQ4B7KMDWFARIJPFGUKH6UYQT7JWO, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC4TTAS6FBLNXEWL5O6TWLCBWNPUQ4B7KMDWFARIJPFGUKH6UYQT7JWO is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- cfcbd0cedeaf128d031bbc24a0707bc423035d0e1f0616e831e6825e5ef1320f
- request
- ed874aa1cada6f02c3c42933c40ba776e26df01518efc43e22d5090599190ace
- transaction
- 318a854c25655e490e68bafcba3b2913fc9fb2e044116ae565fea069bc769612computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 8078
the chainentry 8078
- sealed to the entry before
- cb1d82d57f9cdc3de72778a9fbd0def95b0d27679dcd5d3aaba0645ab3c606d2
- this leaf
- f5e8fef7e08ea3929cda0dbdef8585cebcf112cf5e88e501aed4b8671cb78d7a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- COdMfLAV5NmxBJiXFjOctrlKKuHN0jarcm+Tg9Hc/AgOn99POBBGQN08lt/uEChnn8+l6qp0Bo8oYUGJjsk6Dg==