why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC3P3DHKOQQ6XN262LFNFRQ7ZUT3POKTR3U4Q6KB2DSWYQMKVR4LM2U3, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC3P3DHKOQQ6XN262LFNFRQ7ZUT3POKTR3U4Q6KB2DSWYQMKVR4LM2U3 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 2fbaf67bd3f0965fc23d6642ec203356ed50be996f2c02f57e961959d4905e3b
- request
- 6f37a7c7bb3dc6598d9a825e20f91585abf67f10180be10fb1ce9afb29eaadb5
- transaction
- aa6bcb4c9fbeddf2cd6174763e7343010eed14bb4c98821f649a6d234c5a66e0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 40452
the chainentry 40452
- sealed to the entry before
- e68db3a58fdc295d2e3a12da54979efec5629563dff15b6235726319e39cf7c6
- this leaf
- f6a5aa2cd62fd831c411a526b06dae3564ce40d7f21849702ed4e30df9988e92
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- AoOryU08hiCU5DN7J7j+fcujfgxUCqIcoglHvsIv6qp68RbBdKOvZDLAmXYV1vfL6IUaO+9qW9eI0PrMNq1ZCw==