livelog 10,840 entries · root dbaf05ca62c8 · read 22:17:37
the record/entry 10674
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GATVWFJNFRRTQWNKXJV33CWD5DJBTSVUCLPSRIBDVIVDZBOTNEX2R2HP to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.535ms2026-08-16 19:27:27
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GATVWFJNFRRTQWNKXJV33CWD5DJBTSVUCLPSRIBDVIVDZBOTNEX2R2HP to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
81a624d1b3f8b6807b6d71584f9294ffed7061305076914120f9a251210efe79
request
02949dd4d77074efb333eeff7ebe1d9965019ac468ce1da1b0f1cd9dabdfe48a
transaction
43eeec55551c1e8d8ae833c8e912718a193f00d0e154a61ee0f20fb74e58a564
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10674
recomputing…
the chainentry 10674
sealed to the entry before
9de1003cefbe6897cc70dbc08613ad1062a8ccbdd744902bd80dc2d2b36f5a0a
this leaf
f714b38ca1a5cec4f714dc544700f6b61a8780b9031ba38bc8c4982c6fd453ed
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
fDJOedKhBu+6uLFViN4o9zOT+6JIBSv2YJggqyFNw3gnBjwuZQ9XjOXwNmoFLiYDHHu22KXzMja/kwyyucwlDg==