why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBKMQ3V562TRUCOUZEWC6NHBXAW5U44SADO4KZDSR5QINQS4FXHKPHN3 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8697c8dffa7143e1bfd7615fd57f25074e021c316db670dff0406eb1f4cbb451
- request
- 4d5ec1aeee422a5b6e3932d9d67e1408e524ee4ff237613f0ce2ca0e040340ca
- transaction
- 164bbd67cbf341cef32fc61bb12540b644ce80a326104dabead94cac3e72c1eccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 28240
the chainentry 28240
- sealed to the entry before
- a2421c746c505b4bb5b8009b7351520ff4a3e54baffed5c52f4137308af312dc
- this leaf
- f8bf3ae6dd2db9b28e304825c0b9960595b7fdfba83a28200b08ee804137a1fd
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- RJ4j75UmhtxSuQX/v/CswzI/HVBqMjJ7iJMdKrcLqY6QwG10+9M40wZerTAdXEZAbiijpNoZDx4914zkZV7ZCg==