livelog 47,375 entries · root 49476d86f010 · read 04:20:43
the record/entry 46430
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDFOO3PXMRUTYLQLL37XGN3RKOTUHD2XXQ73MLPTUGPVOMGZGRADO4AS to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.086ms2026-09-13 10:55:11
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDFOO3PXMRUTYLQLL37XGN3RKOTUHD2XXQ73MLPTUGPVOMGZGRADO4AS to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
0a6d14a3b6dea5d6d442611533885911da083429cc33b90c2610bd3c9432f7c2
request
7d958293c2563e62118b34a437b96cab130a338e9ddd16fc0e8c9e8e301b850e
transaction
ea7bf851aca56895f4c36df8e75688af38141d00e35a12749b0e810fcdb3a5e3
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 46430
recomputing…
the chainentry 46430
sealed to the entry before
bf0cf6ec8c5d5dfff01e1a09d4d9dcea8032531477e482e09ca7b64557eca642
this leaf
f8c8817ea0596730fec09301aeab1df68cc2712e736ac5fb072fd070d72eb44c
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
BoicrXqjrG9Nocp++ed9HUDLWagx90jhCEkA7w1ISe8RVqoiO6Gh1PzTbPYGjWTcX/jMkSacdDf1mlRtliVmAQ==