why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCHOIJNLOIEV3I7MC6AGZ57Y4H5M3EPIQWYALNU7UV7OW63PMK6XEJ5C to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 259fa7785543afe0545ed392a99937d1404145ad86fef352b8d2dae09f522c10
- request
- c3a66d98394ae347e47f2e6253ca2cd986c1c4bdcfd9bf830fad36854fd6e16e
- transaction
- 89ad0552f7fb0c171c91d9b3eaf4cc93879401dc4bc79e538608eb2002647d90computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 6647
the chainentry 6647
- sealed to the entry before
- cdd7b4eab9cbbd4d3c4cecbb78aad1af083fda5e0736c973462207c8546fb769
- this leaf
- f910d8c0b67c32dab3ec49f40125437cb67bddfb256dd2f58f0a055f08949fec
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- IqB3hYj/MDLM5KHgaV7Rve+m6nyiaU4WiqWKOyi44H5Jcf0LbSYLcoBbJ2Uw+oKGX7Lpq7FCsAT8hrnAptwuBw==