why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC7X5N4AN3HVW4A4PI7XJUD7OPBDVZZK6RGGIVE6UWHJFVGBM4J6I6TG, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC7X5N4AN3HVW4A4PI7XJUD7OPBDVZZK6RGGIVE6UWHJFVGBM4J6I6TG is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- de05b9c2f5dfbd305c111620898c0c0e6aa65b1ffc013957c4e480ce2db3caf4
- request
- 7ee005f8801b095a6fef8a001ad8f7e3059684a516fe65d7f4dbc3a3ccd4852d
- transaction
- 80599b05743ca12ca02e64cbec688fdd8338839b1dfa3a1188e024ad775a52d1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 172
the chainentry 172
- sealed to the entry before
- 51430b6b398d0a86cc9e00def24607b6397c9de8751f2ade89510932a2d86705
- this leaf
- f9b330b67d3e3bc67f43ec28845e3afb121f60e2dee61df60cf07ed27a1d4084
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- /VJR1T1ciMRAtXRgtOa/B/fhpCS0+GJJmxdtEWoRnCagXwu0/EnWNDmDnftnh/TV4MuVy2Thccx/rLtmQ7TcAg==