why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDVIJ4GZQ5U23JLQVFGMNXYZ5L6GXPWCD7JIPPN6XQXS3K7H6KIL6SII to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e4dcafa6097531fe65816bf8eb794143ca5f5a5c9fb77b89e01190870396e81d
- request
- 0a487ed78a30d29e10c9ec0c4961eeb32194f99efe3a0c06e625531ee1ef576b
- transaction
- 5b5516ed175ce62adc61087da7c7b4fa46273f5cb0ea5af353b6bcf193f66732computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 16279
the chainentry 16279
- sealed to the entry before
- eb0f797110bd1b350947fef7d7c7f5f9b2c0cf3e7802650f83305aeaeb332dae
- this leaf
- f9f327a58f5afff72748e938fa9a1582350e8e032adb41d3243bce8937a2abb4
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- K+aWm17FnfyxBWfSVS0p8cfQMhRkL5nv1lW7lva3Z44R+TpFUz4C0HtdRuGRMoW/kZyza60Rh5TRuvqZpoKrCw==