why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCYJ4L3WZAHF3RY5LWIUYB2X3UUCZSVMBZPA7DXL5K27D6XUIBDLWC6C to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- dd8c93e3890696d66bad6470df3e0d0a89f13f748a37425ab60be5b4e9f667da
- request
- 0939f0fbe147975d97a25879cee2dda7841bd7a36598ed4d33a712df4a627d1c
- transaction
- 6d2fb34582a6e3913ec4dffe50182f4934a97702d9c6f2f288bd9818b06ff5dacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 19870
the chainentry 19870
- sealed to the entry before
- b379bfa5eed098febfa02d5ceb198786f9e2a71d4b1663808206a0471cc04833
- this leaf
- fa02538595a527dab194cd32b44c8dd5add9857c8b8af42554fefb58bbd6db76
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- jNjOL6PgHw6L9J8snBx1BGNokD+9z/KSdU0clouhfDgcbC9xSUa1LEZYqUWNtL3AU2VYxhpL1hpeXcCmg+/6Cw==