why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBJJIHKNZTWF4AI6CUJEIGWICOTLFUU6I5FFLYVQAQ3ROABUQCHMNG6O, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBJJIHKNZTWF4AI6CUJEIGWICOTLFUU6I5FFLYVQAQ3ROABUQCHMNG6O is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a20d79fd0d2392ff2b34d0443e7ee80f01f6d3583438e4af6516d5447e62404c
- request
- c452b62115c7050d64f68f63f6d16c16a6b1d32c5048fac9d5e170c291ac425c
- transaction
- 0a4b5e511cf40c10385f774597089d0b98c07bda340de307dd804f6c516446cccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 64642
the chainentry 64642
- sealed to the entry before
- d58058b45a675fd690d6e75b02b8c352976a6995b02d09844133a61de7b218d7
- this leaf
- fab3704474d93347362ea93e40e224391e0b6b1a428f1674adf811ed662bde0b
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- ecL2ewKztpe3eju/6GeoE0TiJCWPeChzi4cr8ReK3RJhwOsa0G6QcNVoDIfT5ijPb1R4z9UlgZT8PNfwXf5nCQ==