why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GBJ24PRD53MX6UAIVN5SKIM64H2GCXSZA4NHVFIODTCJAHPDBYKYZLVH, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCXHUQFT7G5UPYB67EWOED2PHQFXBZIWD4KXRHRJ62NDE6L6KR7ZF457, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCXHUQFT7G5UPYB67EWOED2PHQFXBZIWD4KXRHRJ62NDE6L6KR7ZF457 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b7504a14e0acb5deb3167185b3d9e2f2905eb0d387f37f9847a518c8c095239c
- request
- 52841c033c66b243e8ffad322915b28970d47e4b3b1364e95519fb624f20f64e
- transaction
- d92913678a74d3ba4b5b90b2316c98166f63a47d932d873d97b8633dfa1c9d5ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 55258
the chainentry 55258
- sealed to the entry before
- 6e68d888b9cd16912c6f02a574e541158c63ee7cef87ae1531a8f485d1662a86
- this leaf
- fb24f4b11d3617bb2ded7c780a1d5dbbf363a36dbe79e5e752e4d72e3a523749
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- GTNTspZ1WHNC9+grYcZFskVLxuHFPqXcjxVcUyO6siAP2rS+N0Y/ABCPqeXsIkg3nR8otBoQFgQKTrav8AUxAQ==