livelog 56,881 entries · root 8fc64eccdbcb · read 04:31:22
the record/entry 56478
DENY
refused before it reached the network
op 0 pays GBQEU3X7HWNWD5OETZBN3FLBMT4FICXNUUIBG5QHHG24LYHNS2RJ72XX, which is not in the allowlist
decided in 6.948ms2026-09-20 20:51:14
why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed

op 0 pays GBQEU3X7HWNWD5OETZBN3FLBMT4FICXNUUIBG5QHHG24LYHNS2RJ72XX, which is not in the allowlist

counterpartycounterparty_denied

GBQEU3X7HWNWD5OETZBN3FLBMT4FICXNUUIBG5QHHG24LYHNS2RJ72XX is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
c1e58421991ada0b8b2d17c8b0826b0b048270c086d611b93a02866a0e48cee2
request
e8af17999738f17aeacf3f74388a21f8111d7bd76d99ef73df3c9e515a7ca2c7
transaction
aac4748790af92e27160b1af72a0836570b96d7cf8d688df657cdf176be2af7a
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56478
recomputing…
the chainentry 56478
sealed to the entry before
8047cb53fcc794b186d3119f7220c64eb412cecb1a47200ed37a2c330ba7bc8f
this leaf
fb2c20703bffe3d44883bd961c6d1e617c1b9a5762575dd1907b9402110f25b5
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
sSwfixhZ6Lls/oGf9P4Rlg2n1E8YAWLTK79CGFgdK6WVbu9IQ7CD4mq4bhXTgPhhMvEkJSKv3d5zyDJPtHoOAQ==