livelog 55,553 entries · root 728358c59aee · read 03:55:28
the record/entry 53920
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCLIEWEPIHAQJMP3NWC6OSKQZJZEVCXLDITHVTHPTHWII3PMS4GHPDDL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.854ms2026-09-18 22:00:15
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCLIEWEPIHAQJMP3NWC6OSKQZJZEVCXLDITHVTHPTHWII3PMS4GHPDDL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
c1573c468f4f885a9492742f5fe0f929f6943a85ac364162288eb6b17973206c
request
f778ff9ed342b5a80cf88762f4470f0536e3ef870985551f360c615a0f8452ba
transaction
2988480f1474da8eaa27107d4ee23cf0ba0f589d03bbad386710503ab6b9c885
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 53920
recomputing…
the chainentry 53920
sealed to the entry before
e673087e8936bdc00536c0aee631eb40a6619e51fce19d7b2eef414c41cd52ac
this leaf
fbb29919e76855bf7e570be9c9c015ea9a1d8b46f7830994b23917989f1683d9
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
1xOMmRAbw4yYL1v5J/6kx2Q/TVH++Qk60s046xYuGQBOiaRYvDrZPzJVg9uluILl1xUjRLUJczVR10R7m4RyAw==