why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAMPPKVZE3HM22NKLTWO34U2VR7O7L4L67SXXJCIMRU5ZOHAWRJT3USP to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- ac5c066a68589427aa2d5bb2c23922a1a6f95a7209a4588bbf6c0c0d6a7a0d21
- request
- 907648cdb0afe0e616c4efdf07b83108ebbbede36210a54f711110e7b88cabe2
- transaction
- f44ab6f351b577c6f6e8d1c8f0617ae9cd2015eb5a9e1d0f94d83b1b0c85be7bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 51949
the chainentry 51949
- sealed to the entry before
- c6dae0fde822970875f66fb22e29e6c39b4e897923ded659eed95a79a2dfbd1a
- this leaf
- fccdd59d0438ba5351a0594ffd6ffe63b52594c971a041489d5ba84eb5845b22
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- NnrFa0Ek3JGBEsYnDiOc2o2zpXR5ADyEyeDGyjiljxkUrFTB/Xzkgz4Erpy8rwqJ+gtT8Rf1/en8MHNvhNBfDA==