why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCQ5QJRL457JHG7KQV5CBD3E7ZS2FFUEALB3S4H7CSRTAWHZZF36JFAA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 18ef342082712bccf65cdc2c036da43cfd62a6eaf0661a6b83af35439b3b3d48
- request
- a2f961c7947c22fc7dbf327386236d10ffda87cb1d87d9139bb912fa53f1aefb
- transaction
- 87ef5eb47c3cac805cb11b7af5d6815d25ffb038bc082077815afe9f4cc798c8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 12772
the chainentry 12772
- sealed to the entry before
- e6036315f7011f483718613857db86163fcfc912728488aa2e135161285b1b30
- this leaf
- fceedf33422b29e0b3ad2cf57a5a35b7bf717b557a128d02adeb6d5444387a9d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- vMe3b3vXZVGXfa/708Z1XHjNzPdtSUbUB1sPL1+xYf1xaRZAPuZS/WzxDZrZPIgEEZ31b+C+tWTNWOrJyhkaCg==