livelog 59,346 entries · root e96659645913 · read 02:10:23
the record/entry 59238
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCQHKKXRNSKHEGHR3ZLCRWQDQIHUXKSS2HDWB3FN5ICILWFYPAYJOTVF to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.313ms2026-09-23 00:10:08
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCQHKKXRNSKHEGHR3ZLCRWQDQIHUXKSS2HDWB3FN5ICILWFYPAYJOTVF to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
821ebea8b0b4500640f8df145294eff79c9aa91f838b4f2d12c011c79d462237
request
48083de088a18bdad327f9d34dc6db347ce877ef5dde552cdd230d6fce04b1c9
transaction
9f0f543037cfe76244e26ec706033147a1c1d1ffe6567ec86be607091f33b063
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 59238
recomputing…
the chainentry 59238
sealed to the entry before
39fe2028b5da4119801f097f81263abbd49bfe76ffdacb01d0429576e9158d47
this leaf
fdd015f39d4c0d90eba2df970e87cbb34e6324cf5000e4ecc8929eea7251c33e
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
1SZcROxzV6yYhU9PdfqnIOLeKg4yTdH6eva6QDh4mCfMC5HkpjGqb22xzg1UOWSQ5RFkc017e58QRE+jB/SVAg==