why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBDJCJTV2A7Z2PLJZ5OVXHS6TWZUTYGQG3BN6ZSYLOHZW6XDVDYL35ZQ, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 700.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 773a7a84f31b27b9467a7f5c915a1e6f7715d8eeada86193f14bb673253b72e5
- request
- 1f86213216f8897cc2ca8394d27ae1d728c09f1fff2cae4e25dec74de065bfc1
- transaction
- 5e0aebe267ce35100ac5a4910d38baa04beab141b4752e006264a6c1ee9d9b5fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57352
the chainentry 57352
- sealed to the entry before
- 6b7569c9c5cde6c6345ed8e3c4ecb22e158f83f67ff163ed2953d1ddbfa17d7e
- this leaf
- fe658a4cc3b8a86561292b46cd398504ccd7adb9e257a77935b1b6f07926c787
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- YZuqesWmoKvtU50mNEdI2WsYpDDFbp3v88OJqnE2sn2bnUVfXT8alDvUrEP3lhMi13COKXrXb+eekw+riXboCQ==