livelog 31,681 entries · root e95af1c5d512 · read 01:38:00
the record/entry 31079
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDZTR7C7KQPCN5GQBWFHQH3HTFTUZ7TAFR6KVXJIYLJOL3LNGDCVRGBG to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.030ms2026-09-01 14:37:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDZTR7C7KQPCN5GQBWFHQH3HTFTUZ7TAFR6KVXJIYLJOL3LNGDCVRGBG to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
755dfe2545104af88ee9c10105f49f2e55c36e22298a62b6692310eb46f26d40
request
adac4d25998b7ad3e8917881ccebd0ad1ae9d0dc7737b04f58e4a24a8d95be16
transaction
58fa51a8ef5c4300ecdf803bcc7dc8e291c58389aa3d746a2909d5f445599843
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 31079
recomputing…
the chainentry 31079
sealed to the entry before
0cfb0072c7802d96547712d088c45177890270913ec2838481ae3ae9eb23f22f
this leaf
ff809e15767e112f7c07ed453aad4e655c7fd1fd20b0bc523368bc305c5a1fc1
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
4p3NaaeyspUKCySeQf8ASPBT+930csZF/CItFGbA8/UsTEb+IzR18LN5sHFtWuPYZ6tFaQaAAh/v3AU3aKcsDA==