why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GA7RG6Y2GSCRSZQ75IYD5LKUKNRZCSNKV7BJWHAPDO6KS5ODPCOS5WXF to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 35c182fdc4b74cefe7d24c8b0f5efa376073cac5c4ebe1b4ae9e9f1ab8d03948
- request
- fcc80ed72601c19f3f8de2fd0fd830460cd06bd97dff2dbaca40b1a54d0543aa
- transaction
- f3843138a17a3d450e0a4b98484dcc592ef8b11f4263cd6fd5695b59eba2e606computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 61425
the chainentry 61425
- sealed to the entry before
- a63eb6ba5c39d1df2264a1e7897f93eaaf143f415d0bf8e54e0c1e8382d40f72
- this leaf
- ff9bdb796564ae2311a1b84b5ab6d0b879c77368d677c65a7ab25104ed4b594e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 5GgyhzXg1gALlh+Lsp84VsugAmYrEES1pyyftIcOSHjHU5Fp7MM+1OEPEGMspawJhcTXYl8BR0mobQPBJW+zDQ==