livelog 48,534 entries · root ac63771c4611 · read 01:21:29
the record/entry 48445
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCPJYU5AJFDXAUMFBVKTRZEQHSDIFYVNMTNVHPL426437RQLVTMIGTMX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.109ms2026-09-14 23:40:09
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCPJYU5AJFDXAUMFBVKTRZEQHSDIFYVNMTNVHPL426437RQLVTMIGTMX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
668aa9d12790a5ee55ffdafea15635e8fe095ac332292323457810cd419057e3
request
4d2292b925a8b0d3059020861d8dddf6633748a2aafaed37d4e7ac2f9e2c9e43
transaction
e77800f4cc6fbbaddf575da614200e13dd9daa243d58c89411103a2a712934a5
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 48445
recomputing…
the chainentry 48445
sealed to the entry before
54ef14f1f7b0d45e88964850fa2207c9f33022da16cb26a32774ed74d40d17db
this leaf
ffdbac0167e189484b5df725d8b72de889717d4468333dde8e66e99362cc76a3
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
c5mDbu5EADj295gnFMVld1l9Y19a5Fk4a15CxEWTJpbS+9mTT1GHR49KuAJjNgF/XpD4DdszR/tpVFbMqjZ2CA==