why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCPJYU5AJFDXAUMFBVKTRZEQHSDIFYVNMTNVHPL426437RQLVTMIGTMX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 668aa9d12790a5ee55ffdafea15635e8fe095ac332292323457810cd419057e3
- request
- 4d2292b925a8b0d3059020861d8dddf6633748a2aafaed37d4e7ac2f9e2c9e43
- transaction
- e77800f4cc6fbbaddf575da614200e13dd9daa243d58c89411103a2a712934a5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 48445
the chainentry 48445
- sealed to the entry before
- 54ef14f1f7b0d45e88964850fa2207c9f33022da16cb26a32774ed74d40d17db
- this leaf
- ffdbac0167e189484b5df725d8b72de889717d4468333dde8e66e99362cc76a3
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- c5mDbu5EADj295gnFMVld1l9Y19a5Fk4a15CxEWTJpbS+9mTT1GHR49KuAJjNgF/XpD4DdszR/tpVFbMqjZ2CA==